Key Differences
In short — Xeon Silver 4116 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon Silver 4116 is 266 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Silver 4116
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G4900 - 384 vs 378 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon Silver 4116 - 54 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Silver 4116 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
378
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10679 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Silver 4116 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon Silver | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
85 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |