Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 4687 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 151% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5620 - 565 vs 225 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 9 7900
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
