Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3887 days newer than Xeon E5540.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5540
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E5540 - 284 vs 272 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5540 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5540 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5540
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5540 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
| Nehalem-EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
