Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Xeon E5540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700U is 3569 days newer than Xeon E5540.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5540 - 122 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E5540 - 15 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5540 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5540
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5540 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Nehalem-EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
