Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 3864 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 80 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 18% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5520 - 183 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5520 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5520 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Core i9-9900KS
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Gainestown | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 127 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
