Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 1988 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 80 vs 85 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5520 - 116 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5520 - 16 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Gainestown | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
