Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3887 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 16% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5520 - 503 vs 432 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5520 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
Gainestown | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |