Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 4929 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5520 - 168 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5520 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Core i9-13900K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Gainestown | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
