Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 4425 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 28% better in New World than Xeon E5520 - 124 vs 97 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E5520 - 45 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5520 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5520 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Gainestown | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
