Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2697 v3 outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2697 v3 is 1062 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
- Performs up to 169% better in League of Legends than FX-8120 - 145 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 125 vs 145 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |