Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2696 v3 outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2696 v3 is 735 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3240 - 127 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 36 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell E | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |