Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon E5-2683 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1025 days newer than Xeon E5-2683 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 120 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 197 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 64 vs 28 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2683 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | EPYC |
| Haswell | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 14 | Cores | 32 |
| 28 | Threads | 64 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
