Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1318 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 174 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2667 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
