Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 727 days older than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 168 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
