Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1318 days newer than Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Core i3-4130T - 268 vs 264 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Core i3-4130T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
