Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Core i5-5257U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 772 days newer than Core i5-5257U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-5257U - 166 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5257U - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5257U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 28 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Core i5-5257U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i5-5257U |
|---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Broadwell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel Iris 6100 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
