Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 372 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 130 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 124 vs 120 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2667 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
