Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 32% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 223 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-13700
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 16 |
| 20 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
