Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 193 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-13700
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 12 |
| 24 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
