Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1899 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 519 vs 516 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |