Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 1673 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 1% better in New World than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 105 vs 104 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 15 vs 55 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 15 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |