Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2501 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 5% better in Metro Exodus than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 146 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 24 vs 12 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$450
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |