Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 1394 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 80 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 122 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$495
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $495 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |