Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 80 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 39% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 208 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$383.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $383.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |