Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is 2515 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- Performs up to 12% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 356 vs 318 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
356
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$345.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $345.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13361 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Renoir |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |