Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Xeon E5-2609 v2 vs Core i3-3220

Xeon E5-2609 v2 vs Core i3-3220: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 363 days older than Xeon E5-2609 v2.

Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220

  • Performs up to 4% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 608 vs 587 FPS
  • Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 55 vs 80 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Minecraft.
Minecraft

Minecraft

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 Logo
Xeon E5-2609 v2

Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013


FPS

587

96%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Intel Core i3-3220 Logo
Core i3-3220

Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012


FPS

608

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.1/FPS

100%

Price, $

$59.9

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i3-3220 Processor (3M Cache, 3.30 GHz) BX80637i33220

Buy for $59.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 157 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 Logo
Xeon E5-2609 v2

Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013

Intel Core i3-3220 Logo
Core i3-3220

Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 Logo
Xeon E5-2609 v2

Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013


Single-Core

350

66%

Multi-Core

998

91%

Intel Core i3-3220 Logo
Core i3-3220

Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

525

100%

Multi-Core

1085

100%

Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 Logo

Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2

vs
Intel Core i3-3220 Logo

Intel Core i3-3220

Sep 1st, 2013
Release DateSep 3rd, 2012
Xeon E5CollectionCore i3
Ivy BridgeCodenameIvy Bridge
Intel Socket 2011SocketIntel Socket 1155
Server
Segment
Desktop
4
Cores2
4Threads4
2.5 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
80 WTDP
55 W
22 nmProcess Size22 nm
25.0xMultiplier
33.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
Intel HD 2500
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.