Buy on Amazon
$74.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 313 days older than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 154 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 6 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
154
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD OEM FX-6300 Vishera Six-Core Black Edition AM3+ 3.5Ghz Desktop CPU Processor
Buy for $74.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E5-2609 v2 or FX-6300
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, 1920 x 1080, Ultra+
1 FPS
$1388.88/FPS
GeForce GT 710
FX-6300
8 GB, 240 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,388.88
In Stock
1 FPS
$999.99/FPS
Radeon R7 240
FX-6300
8 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$999.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
