Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 84 days older than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 158 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 55 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $55.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |