Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 848 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 150 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |