Buy on Amazon
$79
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $182
Availability
MSRP in USD: $182
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1630 v3 outperforms Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1630 v3 is 297 days older than Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Boxed Core I5-6400 FC-LGA14C 2.70 Ghz 6 M Processor Cache 4 LGA 1151 BX80662I56400
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6540 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-6400
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E5-1630 v3 or Core i5-6400
Dead Space, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
44 FPS
$18.76/FPS
GeForce GTX 1070
Core i5-6400
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$825.24
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
