Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 48% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 245 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-13700F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
