Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v3 and Xeon E5-2650 v3 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 231 vs 228 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1078
100%
Multi-Core
3819
71.01152844923763%
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
886
82.18923933209648%
Multi-Core
5378
100%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
