Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms Ryzen 5 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v3 is 1581 days older than Ryzen 5 3500U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen 5 3500U - 108 vs 105 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 15 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |