Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v3 is 1583 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 305 vs 303 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
