Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v3 is 497 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-4800MQ - 135 vs 134 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 47 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
