Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3038 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 24% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 134 vs 108 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4060 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |