Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2906 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 264 vs 241 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
264
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13901 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |