Buy on Amazon
$450
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1207
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1207
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1626 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 3% better in God of War than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 179 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 24 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$450
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-core, 24-Threads Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1575M v5
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
