Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2111 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 30% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 717 vs 553 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 24 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1575M v5
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Core i9-12900K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
