Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1558 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 592 vs 553 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 20 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
592
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2486 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |