Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1878 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 184 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |