Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1290 v2 outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1290 v2 is 162 days older than FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-4300 - 157 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 87 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |