Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 4020 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 95 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 63% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Xeon E3-1280 - 103 vs 63 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 150 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |