Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 v3 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 v3 is 414 days older than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-4160T - 405 vs 393 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 35 vs 82 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
82 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |