Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 v3 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 v3 is 279 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Performs up to 28% better in Starfield than FX-4130 - 55 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 82 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2231 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |