Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon E3-1230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3017 days newer than Xeon E3-1230.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1230
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Xeon E3-1230 - 268 vs 256 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
268
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2701 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |