Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2334 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2334 is 2606 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2334
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-4160T - 249 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2334 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E-2334 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2334
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2334 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
