Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2180 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-3250 - 243 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
230
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7602 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |