Buy on Amazon
$109.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $289
Availability
MSRP in USD: $289
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2136 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2136 is 315 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2136
- Performs up to 5% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 178 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 80 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2136 - 16 vs 12 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
169
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
AMD YD190XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Xeon E-2136
Server/Workstation • Jul 12th, 2018
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2136 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
