Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Pentium G840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2230 days newer than Pentium G840.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G840
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 11% better in Dota 2 than Pentium G840 - 184 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G840 - 64 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Pentium G840
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G840 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | EPYC |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
